California is one of the strongest advocates among the states for abortion extremism. California was one of the first states to legalize abortion before Roe, and has codified it in the state constitution and statutes many times since. California has dozens of abortion centers, mostly clustered around Los Angeles, and allows “abortion on demand” through virtual visits. Starting in 2024, public colleges and universities will be required by California law to stock and dispense chemical abortion pills in their on-campus health clinics. California also permits non-doctors to perform abortions and the California Supreme Court has mandated that MediCal cover all abortions as “medically necessary”, meaning that California taxpayers are forced to pay for elective abortions. Fighting against this pro-abortion atmosphere are the nearly 150 pregnancy resource centers serving women across the state. 

The California state legislature operates year-round in two-year sessions. Both chambers are comprised of a super-majority of pro-abortion lawmakers, and lawmakers are working with Governor Newsom and pro-abortion activists on the “California Future of Abortion Council.” The legislature is also currently considering bills that would extend the “right to abortion” to permit a form of infanticide in certain circumstances and to pay for women in other states to travel to California for late-term abortions. 

California judges are appointed by the governor, confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, and then confirmed on the ballot during the next general election.  

Governor Newsom sees himself as a champion for abortion. He recently signed legislation forcing insurance plans to cover all abortion-related costs, and in response to Dobbs, he signed legislation to protect Californians from “civil liability for providing, aiding, or receiving abortion care in the state.” More pregnancies end in abortion in California than in any other state, but California does not gather or publicize any data on complications or outcomes. California does occasionally inspect abortion businesses, but exempts them from many building code standards. 

After the 2022 Midterm Elections, Governor Newsom kept his position as Governor. Attorney General Rob Bonta will complete a second term.

Receive the latest pro-life news & legal alerts

Stay informed as we advance the human right to life.

California Abortion Quick Facts

  • Abortion is legal in California.
  • California limits abortions after viability (usually 24-26 weeks) with some exceptions.
  • Chemical abortion pills need tighter regulation in California and can be prescribed via telemedicine.

California’s Pro-Life Laws Across the Spectrum

Americans United for Life advances the human right to life across the spectrum of issues confronting the dignity of the human person. AUL’s comprehensive analysis of California’s state laws on human life span the full spectrum of life issues from abortion, to health and safety protections, to patient informed consent, to conscience rights and bioethics.

California’s Pro-Life Laws Key

  • Yes, California has this law and it is enforceable
  • California has this law in place, but it is currently not in effect due to litigation
  • No, California has no such law in place
  • Not Applicable
  • To Be Determined

State Constitutional Amendments and Statutes

Americans United for Life covers broad pro-life laws in this section. This includes both state constitutional amendments and state statutes designed to protect preborn human life. FOCA/RHA (or Freedom of Choice Acts/Reproductive Health Acts) are laws designed to enshrine and expand abortion and abortion businesses.

  • Constitutional amendment stating no right to abortion
  • Constitutional amendment preventing state funding of abortion
  • Conditional law prohibiting abortion when Roe is overturned
  • Pre-Roe abortion ban that will take effect when Roe is overturned
  • FOCA/RHA, codifying an abortion right in state law

Mother-Child Gestational and Procedural Protections

States can protect both mother and child by limiting abortion by gestational age or prohibiting gruesome abortion methods. This category also includes life-saving care requirements for a child born-alive after an abortion, and health and safety requirements for a woman undergoing a chemical abortion.


  • Gestational protections by age/week for preborn children
  • Basic medical care for infant children born alive during attempted abortions
  • Partial-birth (D&X) abortion ban
  • Dismemberment (D&E) abortion ban
  • Telemedicine abortion ban
  • Follow up scheduled with patient for abortion pills complications

Prenatal Non-Discrimination (PRENDA) Protections

Increasingly states are enacting laws to protect unborn babies from eugenic abortions based on gender, disability, or race. Some states provide life-affirming resources for families who receive a diagnosis of a possible genetic anomaly like Down syndrome so they know that they’ll be supported.


  • Protection against discrimination based on gender
  • Protection against discrimination due to prenatal diagnosis
  • Protection against discrimination based on race
  • State-provided life-affirming resources for parents and families

Informed Consent Laws

Many states require a woman to give informed consent to an abortion, which holds abortion to a similar standard as other medical procedures. These protections include the disclosure of an abortion procedure’s nature and risks, the performance of an ultrasound to date the pregnancy and allow a woman to meet her unborn child if she chooses, and the time for a woman to reflect on this grave decision.


  • Basic informed consent for mothers concerning abortion
  • Patient signature or written confirmation of informed consent from provider
  • Patient is provided state-sponsored informed consent website/information
  • Reflection period (48 hours) protecting a mother’s discernment and choice
  • An ultrasound is required to give a mother the opportunity to meet their child
  • Information on risks of abortion procedure
  • Information on the possibility of abortion pill reversal care

Abortion Reporting in Public Health Data

Reporting requirements ensure the government and public have a comprehensive view of abortion in the state when making important public policy decisions. This data includes basic information on instances of abortion, the gestational age of the aborted unborn child, demographics, procedure type, and complications.


  • Basic reporting on instances of abortion
  • Abortion reporting includes gestational age data
  • Abortion reporting includes demographic information
  • Abortion reporting includes procedure type
  • Complication reporting
  • Anonymized/aggregate data is made available to the public
  • Anonymized/aggregate data is submitted to the CDC

Parental Rights and Protection of Minors

States protect a minor considering abortion by involving her parents in her life-changing decision, but also provide guidelines for judicial bypass to parental involvement when it is necessary. Other laws included in this section are safe haven laws which create a safe pathway to give up an infant and prevent child abandonment, and the dissemination of information on perinatal hospice to parents of unborn children with fetal anomalies.


  • Parental consent before a minor obtains an abortion
  • Parental notice of a minor obtaining an abortion
  • Judicial bypass limits
  • Mandatory reporting of suspected abuse
  • Safe haven protections (72 hours)
  • Perinatal hospice resources

Basic Health and Safety Standards

These laws bring abortion businesses up to the health and safety standards of medical facilities. States may limit both chemical and surgical abortion procedures to physicians, require the physician be licensed by the state, and require emergency transfer agreements or admitting privileges for the physician or the facility to protect a patient if she suffers post-abortion complications.


  • Established health and safety standards for abortion businesses
  • Basic regulatory inspections for abortion businesses
  • Only physicians can perform abortions (all methods)
  • Physicians required to be licensed in the state
  • Emergency transfer/admitting privilege patient protections
  • Physician’s license/credentials are disclosed to patients

Legal Recognition of Human Dignity for Preborn Persons

This section covers the ways states recognize the human dignity of unborn children. States increasingly require dignified disposition of fetal remains, whether from abortion or miscarriage. The law may provide for the issuance of a fetal death or stillbirth certificate. States may also protect the dignity of unborn children by prohibiting fetal experimentation and banning the sale or transfer of human fetal remains.


  • Dignified disposition of fetal remains required
  • Parents may request dignified disposition
  • Human fetal death or stillbirth certificate issued to recognize the life of human persons (20 weeks)
  • Sale or transfer of human fetal remains prohibited
  • Fetal experimentation banned

Fetal Homicide and Wrongful Death/Life

Fetal homicide laws establish criminal penalties for the death of an unborn child. Wrongful death suits provide a civil cause of action for the death of an unborn child. A prohibition on wrongful life/birth suits affirms that no life is “unwanted.”


  • Fetal homicide criminalization
  • Fetal homicide law in place from the moment of conception
  • Wrongful death suits
  • Prohibition on wrongful life/birth suits

Assisted Suicide and Patient Care

These laws protect end-of-life patients from physician-assisted suicide, a practice that exploits vulnerable patients, has little government oversight, and undermines modern medicine. The Life-Sustaining Care Act ensures healthcare professionals may not override a minor patient or her surrogate’s decision to obtain or continue life-sustaining care. States with patient nondiscrimination acts protect patients from age or disability discrimination.


  • Assisted suicide prohibition
  • Life-sustaining care act
  • Patient non-discrimination on the basis of age or disability

Bioethics, Human Cloning, and Embryo Research

As medical technology evolves, states increasingly enact pro-life bioethics policies to reaffirm human dignity and ban cloning. These laws also require ethical medical practices, ban destructive embryo research, and regulate assisted reproductive technology.


  • Bans human cloning
  • Bans taxpayer funding for human cloning
  • Bans destructive embryo research
  • Encourages ethical alternatives to embryo research
  • Requires informed consent for assisted reproductive technologies
  • Regulates egg harvesting

Healthcare Freedom of Conscience

These laws protect the freedom of conscience of healthcare professionals, institutions, and pharmacists against forced participation in assisted suicide and abortion. States also safeguard the conscience rights of healthcare professionals and institutions against unethical medical research.


  • Individuals protected against abortion participation
  • Public/Private institutions protected against abortion participation
  • Pharmacists protected against abortion participation
  • Individuals protected against participation in unethical research
  • Private/public institutions protected against participation in unethical research
  • Individuals protected against participation in assisted suicide
  • Private/public institutions protected against participation in assisted suicide
  • Pharmacists protected against participation in assisted suicide

California Pro-Life Legislation Tracker

California Abortion Inspection Initiative

AUL submitted a public records request to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) pursuant to the California Public Records Act, Cal. Gov. Code § 6250 et seq. California’s response was sparse. Department authorities told AUL staff that “[a]s of October 15, 2019, there are 24 health clinics offering abor- tion services currently in operation in California.” According to officials, state author- ities have received “186 Complaints and Entity Report Incidents associated with 202 allega- tions from 23 abortion services health clinics.” Additionally, CDPH conducted 91 surveys of 21 abortion providers. CDPH cited 53 viola- tions associated with 38 surveys from 15 health clinics related to abortion services. Of the reports AUL actually received, many were responses to complaints and limited to investi- gating the complaint at hand. Most of the substantiated complaints involved violations of patient privacy. In one incident involving a patient who said she felt a “baseball-sized blood clot” in her cervix, an unlicensed “reproductive health specialist” who only had a high school diploma performed the patient’s transvaginal ultrasound. The abortion business’s director, assistant director, and nurse practitioner claimed they were following a “national organi- zation’s” protocols and said they thought a reproductive health specialist could perform transvaginal ultrasounds if trained by clinic staff to do so. But the California Medical Board notified them that “conducting a vaginal ultrasound is outside of the scope of a medical assistant. This is an invasive procedure, and is not authorized under the statutes and regulations applicable to medical assistants.”

DATE RANGE: 2012–2019