Oregon has failed to protect Life, placing women and unborn children at risk. After Roe, Oregon’s Reproductive Health Equity Act means abortion remains permitted at all gestational ages. The state does not have any commonsense abortion regulation, including an informed consent law, an ultrasound requirement, a parental involvement law for minors seeking abortion, abortion facility regulations or a prohibition on non-physicians performing an abortion.
The State Senate and House of Representatives are controlled by pro-abortion Democrats, which will make it incredibly difficult to pass Life-affirming legislation.
Oregon Supreme Court justices are selected through nonpartisan elections and serve six-year terms. According to Ballotpedia, the state supreme court is controlled by Democrats. There is no current abortion litigation in the state. Previously, a state intermediate appellate court ruled the state must publicly fund elective abortion for women on medical assistance.
Newly elected Governor Tina Kotek is openly pro-abortion and was endorsed by Planned Parenthood PAC of Oregon. While in the House of Representatives, she helped pass a bill that created a fund for in- and out-of-state women looking to get an abortion. Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum also issued a statement lamenting the overturn of Roe and calling Oregon to “step up to ensure we provide safe harbor to those who are not [safe].”
According to AUL’s Unsafe project, Oregon appears to lack any regulatory framework for inspecting abortion businesses. AUL only received a few inspection reports in response to its public records request. However, federal certification inspection reports showed health and safety violations, and inadequate facility standards.
Receive the latest pro-life news & legal alerts
Stay informed as we advance the human right to life.
Oregon Abortion Quick Facts
- Abortion is legal in Oregon.
- Abortion is available and legal for any reason up till the point of birth in Oregon.
- Chemical abortion pills need regulation in Oregon and can be prescribed via telemedicine.
Oregon’s Pro-Life Laws Across the Spectrum
Americans United for Life advances the human right to life across the spectrum of issues confronting the dignity of the human person. AUL’s comprehensive analysis of Oregon’s state laws on human life span the full spectrum of life issues from abortion, to health and safety protections, to patient informed consent, to conscience rights and bioethics.
Oregon’s Pro-Life Laws Key
|Yes, Oregon has this law and it is enforceable|
|Oregon has this law in place, but it is currently not in effect due to litigation|
|No, Oregon has no such law in place|
|To Be Determined|
State Constitutional Amendments and Statutes¹
Americans United for Life covers broad pro-life laws in this section. This includes both state constitutional amendments and state statutes designed to protect preborn human life. FOCA/RHA (or Freedom of Choice Acts/Reproductive Health Acts) are laws designed to enshrine and expand abortion and abortion businesses.
|Constitutional amendment stating no right to abortion|
|Constitutional amendment preventing state funding of abortion|
|Conditional law prohibiting abortion when Roe is overturned|
|Pre-Roe abortion ban that will take effect when Roe is overturned|
|FOCA/RHA, codifying an abortion right in state law|
Mother-Child Gestational and Procedural Protections²
States can protect both mother and child by limiting abortion by gestational age or prohibiting gruesome abortion methods. This category also includes life-saving care requirements for a child born-alive after an abortion, and health and safety requirements for a woman undergoing a chemical abortion.
|Gestational protections by age/week for preborn children|
|Basic medical care for infant children born alive during attempted abortions|
|Partial-birth (D&X) abortion ban|
|Dismemberment (D&E) abortion ban|
|Telemedicine abortion ban|
|Follow up scheduled with patient for abortion pills complications|
Prenatal Non-Discrimination (PRENDA) Protections
Increasingly states are enacting laws to protect unborn babies from eugenic abortions based on gender, disability, or race. Some states provide life-affirming resources for families who receive a diagnosis of a possible genetic anomaly like Down syndrome so they know that they’ll be supported.
|Protection against discrimination based on gender|
|Protection against discrimination due to prenatal diagnosis|
|Protection against discrimination based on race|
|State-provided life-affirming resources for parents and families|
Informed Consent Laws
Many states require a woman to give informed consent to an abortion, which holds abortion to a similar standard as other medical procedures. These protections include the disclosure of an abortion procedure’s nature and risks, the performance of an ultrasound to date the pregnancy and allow a woman to meet her unborn child if she chooses, and the time for a woman to reflect on this grave decision.
|Basic informed consent for mothers concerning abortion|
|Patient signature or written confirmation of informed consent from provider|
|Patient is provided state-sponsored informed consent website/information|
|Reflection period (24 hours) protecting a mother’s discernment and choice|
|An ultrasound is required to give a mother the opportunity to meet their child|
|Information on risks of abortion procedure|
|Information on the possibility of abortion pill reversal care|
Abortion Reporting in Public Health Data
Reporting requirements ensure the government and public have a comprehensive view of abortion in the state when making important public policy decisions. This data includes basic information on instances of abortion, the gestational age of the aborted unborn child, demographics, procedure type, and complications.
|Basic reporting on instances of abortion|
|Abortion reporting includes gestational age data|
|Abortion reporting includes demographic information|
|Abortion reporting includes procedure type|
|Anonymized/aggregate data is made available to the public|
|Anonymized/aggregate data is submitted to the CDC|
Parental Rights and Protection of Minors
States protect a minor considering abortion by involving her parents in her life-changing decision, but also provide guidelines for judicial bypass to parental involvement when it is necessary. Other laws included in this section are safe haven laws which create a safe pathway to give up an infant and prevent child abandonment, and the dissemination of information on perinatal hospice to parents of unborn children with fetal anomalies.
|Parental consent before a minor obtains an abortion|
|Parental notice of a minor obtaining an abortion|
|Judicial bypass limits|
|Mandatory reporting of suspected abuse|
|Safe haven protections (30 days)|
|Perinatal hospice resources|
Basic Health and Safety Standards
These laws bring abortion businesses up to the health and safety standards of medical facilities. States may limit both chemical and surgical abortion procedures to physicians, require the physician be licensed by the state, and require emergency transfer agreements or admitting privileges for the physician or the facility to protect a patient if she suffers post-abortion complications.
|Established health and safety standards for abortion businesses|
|Basic regulatory inspections for abortion businesses|
|Only physicians can perform abortions (all methods)|
|Physicians required to be licensed in the state|
|Emergency transfer/admitting privilege patient protections|
|Physician’s license/credentials are disclosed to patients|
Legal Recognition of Human Dignity for Preborn Persons
This section covers the ways states recognize the human dignity of unborn children. States increasingly require dignified disposition of fetal remains, whether from abortion or miscarriage. The law may provide for the issuance of a fetal death or stillbirth certificate. States may also protect the dignity of unborn children by prohibiting fetal experimentation and banning the sale or transfer of human fetal remains.
|Dignified disposition of fetal remains required|
|Parents may request dignified disposition|
|Human fetal death or stillbirth certificate issued to recognize the life of human persons (20 weeks)|
|Sale or transfer of human fetal remains prohibited|
|Fetal experimentation banned|
Fetal Homicide and Wrongful Death/Life
Fetal homicide laws establish criminal penalties for the death of an unborn child. Wrongful death suits provide a civil cause of action for the death of an unborn child. A prohibition on wrongful life/birth suits affirms that no life is “unwanted.”
|Fetal homicide criminalization|
|Fetal homicide law in place from the moment of conception|
|Wrongful death suits|
|Prohibition on wrongful life/birth suits|
Assisted Suicide and Patient Care
These laws protect end-of-life patients from physician-assisted suicide, a practice that exploits vulnerable patients, has little government oversight, and undermines modern medicine. The Life-Sustaining Care Act ensures healthcare professionals may not override a minor patient or her surrogate’s decision to obtain or continue life-sustaining care. States with patient nondiscrimination acts protect patients from age or disability discrimination.
|Assisted suicide prohibition|
|Life-sustaining care act|
|Patient non-discrimination on the basis of age or disability|
Bioethics, Human Cloning, and Embryo Research
As medical technology evolves, states increasingly enact pro-life bioethics policies to reaffirm human dignity and ban cloning. These laws also require ethical medical practices, ban destructive embryo research, and regulate assisted reproductive technology.
|Bans human cloning|
|Bans taxpayer funding for human cloning|
|Bans destructive embryo research|
|Encourages ethical alternatives to embryo research|
|Requires informed consent for assisted reproductive technologies|
|Regulates egg harvesting|
Healthcare Freedom of Conscience
These laws protect the freedom of conscience of healthcare professionals, institutions, and pharmacists against forced participation in assisted suicide and abortion. States also safeguard the conscience rights of healthcare professionals and institutions against unethical medical research.
|Individuals protected against abortion participation|
|Public/Private institutions protected against abortion participation|
|Pharmacists protected against abortion participation|
|Individuals protected against participation in unethical research|
|Private/public institutions protected against participation in unethical research|
|Individuals protected against participation in assisted suicide|
|Private/public institutions protected against participation in assisted suicide|
|Pharmacists protected against participation in assisted suicide|
Oregon Pro-Life Legislation Tracker
Oregon Abortion Inspection Initiative
Oregon appears to lack any regulatory framework for inspecting abortion businesses. AUL submitted a public records request, under the Oregon Public Records Law, §192.410 et seq., to the Oregon Health Authority and received only a few state inspection reports. However, AUL did receive over a dozen federal CLIA certification inspection reports relating to Lovejoy Surgicenter that showed clear disregard for standard medical practices, as well as health and safety violations. Inspection reports reflected a lack of regard for facility standards too, including holes in the walls and ceilings and failure to properly maintain electrical systems. At one facility, the director was not an RN, and the director disclosed that several clinical positions were directed/managed by an employee who was not an RN.
In 2012, the state nursing board issued an order banning a clinic nurse from “practicing as a Registered Nurse in any capacity or functioning as a caregiver in any setting” until further order. The order came in response to a lawsuit, filed by a former clinic worker, that alleged that the nurse sexually molested abortion patients while they were under anesthesia and drew the figure of a bird on one sleeping woman. The nurse was also accused of exposing herself to other employees and engaging in other harassing behavior. The nurse also allegedly told other employees to lie to state inspectors about the fact than an unlicensed and unqual- ified worker was overseeing abortion surgeries.
NUMBER OF REPORTS: 19
DATE RANGE: 2009–2019